v.
Creative Marketing Strategies
[Indexed as: Anheuser-Busch v. Creative Marketing]
[Indexed as: ANHEUSERBUSCH.org et al.]
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
Administrative Panel Decision
Case No. WIPO D2000-0529
Commenced: 7 June 2000
Judgment: 16 August 2000
Presiding Panelist: Jeffrey M. Samuels
Domain name - Domain name dispute resolution policy - U.S. Service mark - U.S. Trademark - Identical - Confusingly similar - Bad faith registration - Bad faith use.
Complainant was registrant of United States service mark and United States trademark ANHEUSER-BUSCH. Complainant has used the mark since 1876 on beer. Respondent registered the domain names, anheuserbusch.net and anheuserbusch.org. Respondent has not developed a Web site using the domain name at issue nor made any other good faith use of the domain name.
Held, Name Transferred to Complainant.
It is clear that the domain names incorporate in full the Complainant’s registered mark ANHEUSER-BUSCH and may be deemed confusingly similar, if not identical, to the Complainant’s mark, ANHEUSER-BUSCH. It is also clear that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in respect of the domain name.
Since Respondent offered to sell the domain names to the Complainant for valuable consideration in excess of any out of pocket costs directly related to the domain name, Respondent demonstrated bad faith use of the mark.
Policies referred to
Uniform Policy for Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, adopted August
26, 1999
Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, adopted October
24, 1999
WIPO Supplemental Rules for Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
Registration Agreements referred to
--
Cases referred to
--
Panel Decision referred to
--
Samuels, Panelist: -
1. The Parties
The Complainant in this administrative proceeding is Anheuser-Busch
Incorporated, One Busch Place, St. Louis, Missouri 63118, U.S.A. The Respondent
is Creative Marketing Strategies, 117 Raintree Way, Willliamsburg, Virginia
23188, U.S.A.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain names in dispute are as follows: "anheuserbusch.net" and
"anheuserbusch.org". The domain names were registered by Respondent with
Network Solutions, Inc. (NSI) on December 9, 1998.
3. Procedural Background
On May 30, 2000, the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center received
from Complainant, via e-mail, a complaint for decision in accordance with
the Uniform Policy for Domain Name Dispute Resolution, adopted by the Internet
Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) on August 26, 1999 ("Policy"),
the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, approved by
ICANN on October 24, 1999 ("Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (Supplemental Rules).
The complaint was filed in compliance with the requirements of the
Rules and the Supplemental Rules, payment was properly made, the administrative
panel was properly constituted, and the panelist submitted the required
Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence.
The instant Administrative Proceeding was commenced on June 7, 2000.
Respondent did not file a response, and a "Notification of Respondent
Default" was sent by WIPO to Respondent on July 1, 2000.
The decision of the Panel was due to WIPO on or before August 16, 2000.
4. Factual Background
As set forth in the Complaint, Complainant Anheuser Busch has been
using the mark ANHEUSER-BUSCH since 1876 on beer. The mark is the subject
of U.S. Trademark Registration No. 909,723, which issued on March 9, 1971.
See Complaint, Annex C. Complainant also has registered the domain name
"anheuserbusch.com".
As noted above, Respondent registered the domain names in dispute with
NSI on December 9, 1998. On February 9, 1999, counsel for Complainant sent
two letters to Respondent's administrative contact, Ms. Laura Woldorf,
requesting that she immediately cease all use of the domain names "anheuserbusch.net"
and "anheuserbusch.org". See Complaint, Annex D.
In response, Ms. Woldorf called Complainant's counsel and offered to
sell the domain names for $100,000 each. Ms. Woldorf called several times
thereafter to follow-up on the status of her offer.
On March 24, 1999, Respondent's counsel sent a letter to Complainant's
counsel indicating that his client "is interested in selling her rights
to [the "anheuserbusch.net"] domain name to Busch, for acceptable consideration."
The letter also indicated that Ms. Waldorf [sic] "does not use [the domain
name]." See Complaint, Annex F.
On May 21, 1999, NSI put the domain names in issue "on hold." See Complaint,
Annex H.
On July 9, 1999, Respondent's counsel called Complainant's counsel
and renewed his client's offer to sell the domain names for $100,000 each.
Counsel for Complainant countered with an offer not to sue in exchange
for assignment of the domain names.
On January 31, 2000, NSI informed Complainant's counsel that it was
removing the "hold" on the domain names in dispute. See Complaint, Annex
I.
On March 8, 2000, counsel for Complainant called Respondent's counsel
to discuss the matter. The call was not returned.
5. Parties' Contentions
Complainant contends that the domain names in dispute are confusingly
similar to Complainant's registered mark ANHEUSER-BUSCH; that Respondent
has no rights or legitimate interest in respect of the domain names; and
that the domain names have been registered in bad faith.
6. Discussion and Findings
The Panel determines that Complainant has established all of the elements
required under 4.a. of the Policy.
Respondent's domain names incorporate in full Complainant's registered
mark ANHEUSER-BUSCH and, thus, may be deemed confusingly similar, if not
identical, to Complainant's mark.
It is also clear that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests
in respect of the domain name. None of the circumstances set forth in 4.c.
of the Policy is applicable.
With respect to the issue of "bad faith" registration and use, the
Panel determines, based on the unrebutted evidence, that Respondent offered
to transfer the domain names to Complainant for valuable consideration
in excess of its documented out-of-pocket costs directly related to the
domain names. Pursuant to the relevant Policy (see 4.b(i)), such circumstances
constitute evidence of "bad faith" registration and use.
7. Decision
In view of the above, the Panel GRANTS Complainant's request for transfer
to Complainant of the domain names "anheuserbusch.net" and "anheuserbusch.org".
Domain Name Transferred