Gardens Alive, Inc. v. Home Harvest Garden Supply, Inc.
[Indexed as: Gardens Alive v. Home Harvest Garden Supply]
[Indexed as: gardensalive.com]
National Arbitration Forum
Domain Name Dispute Decision
File No.: FA0003000094296
Judgment: April 25, 2000
Presiding Panelist: Judge Richard B. Wickersham (Ret.)
Domain name - Domain name dispute resolution policy - U.S. Trademark - Identical - Confusingly similar - Bad faith registration - Bad faith use.
Complainant was registrant of United States trademark, GARDENS ALIVE!. Registrant registered the domain name, gardensalive.com. Complainant alleged that its registered marks and the registered domain name were identical and that Respondent registered the domain name at issue in bad faith.
Held, Name Transferred to Complainant
Complainant must establish both bad faith registration and bad faith use.
Complainant has been using the GARDENS ALIVE! mark since as early as December 19, 1998 as a mail order service for botanical products. Respondent's registration of the domain name gardensalive.com has caused and will continue to cause confusion between the domain name and the Complainant's mark GARDENS ALIVE!. Respondent failed to show that it had any legitimate interest in the domain name. It was therefore found that the domain name was registered in bad faith.
It was also found that the confusion created by Respondent's registration of the domain name gardensalive.com was found to be bad faith use of said domain name.
Panel Decision referred to
--
Wickersham, Panelist: -
Procedural History
The above entitled matter came on for an administrative hearing on
April 25, 2000 before the undersigned on the Complaint of Gardens Alive,
Inc., hereinafter "Complainant" against Home Harvest Garden Supply, Inc.,
hereinafter "Respondent". Complainant was represented by Candace Lynn Bell,
Esquire, of Kavinoky & Cook, LLP, 120 Delaware Avenue, Buffalo, New
York 14202. There was no representation on behalf of Respondent. Upon the
written submitted record, the following DECISION is made:
Procedural Findings
1. Complainant has been using the Mark "Gardens Alive!" (hereinafter
"GARDENS ALIVE!" Mark) as a service mark since at least as early as December
19, 1998 in connection with the following services (hereinafter, Complainant's
services):
mail order services
in the field of agricultural, botanical, pet
and animal care
products, in International Class 42 (from the
United States
registration);
providing the
above listed services on and in connection with
an Internet
Web site.
2. Complainant has common law rights in the "GARDENS ALIVE!" Mark
as well as the additional rights acquired based on the service mark
registration in the United States.
3. Complainant submitted a catalog and Web site pages as examples and as evidence of Complainant's use of the "GARDENS ALIVE!" Mark.
4. Complainant has used the "GARDENS ALIVE!" Mark continuously and extensively since at least as early as December 19, 1998 in the United States in connection with the advertising and offering for sale of Complainant's services.
5. Complainant has invested substantial sums of money in developing and marketing Complainant's services using the "GARDENS ALIVE!" Mark.
6. Complainant is the owner of a United States federal service mark registration (Registration No. 1,560,261) registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on the Principal Register and issued on October 10, 1989 for the Mark "GARDENS ALIVE!" for the services set forth above.
7. Complainant's United States Registration for the Mark "GARDENS ALIVE!" was filed on January 23, 1989.
8. Complainant's United States Registration for the Mark "GARDENS ALIVE!" states a date of first use of at least as early as December 19, 1988.
9. Complainant has also used the Mark "GARDENS ALIVE.COM" as the domain name for Complainant's Web site promoting, advertising and offering for sale Complainant's services.
10. Complainant registered the domain name "GARDENS-ALIVE.COM" on July 11, 1996 with Network Solutions, Inc.
11. Respondent registered the domain name "GARDENSALIVE.COM".
12. Respondent's domain name registration for "GARDENSALIVE.COM" is nearly identical to Complainant's "GARDENS ALIVE!" Mark except for the addition of the top-level domain name level designation, namely, ".com" and the subtraction of the "!".
13. Respondent's domain name registration for "GARDENSALIVE.COM" is confusingly similar to Complainant's United States registration for the Mark "GARDENS ALIVE!" because Respondent's domain name registration for "GARDENSALIVE.COM" is identical to the word portion of the Complainant's United States registration. The only difference is the lack of the punctuation mark "!".
14. For these reasons, Respondent's domain name registration for "GARDENSALIVE.COM" is both identical to and confusingly similar to Complainant's "GARDENS ALIVE!" Mark.
Conclusion
15. Respondent's registration of the domain name "GARDENSALIVE.COM",
a domain name nearly identical to Complainant's "GARDENS ALIVE!" Mark,
has caused confusion and continues to cause a likelihood of confusion with
Complainant's "GARDENSALIVE!" Mark.
16. Respondent has therefore registered the domain name "GARDENSALIVE.COM" in bad faith because the registration, the use and the current inactivity created and are still creating a likelihood of confusion with Complainant's "GARDENS ALIVE!" Mark.
17. Complainant believes the "GARDENSALIVE.COM" domain name is identical
and confusing with Complainant's "GARDENS ALIVE!" Mark, that Respondent
has no rights or legitimate interest in the "GARDENSALIVE.COM" domain name
and that the registration of the domain name "GARDENSALIVE.COM" was registered
and used in bad faith. I agree.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the domain name registration at issue,
namely, "GARDENSALIVE.COM" is hereby transferred to the Complainant, "GARDENS
ALIVE, INC."